For enhanced safety, the front and second-row seat shoulder belts of the Subaru Ascent have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Jeep Grand Cherokee L doesn’t offer pretensioners for its second-row seat belts.
With its standard EyeSight, the Subaru Ascent is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Jeep Grand Cherokee L, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
|
Ascent |
Grand Cherokee L |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
| 12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH |
AVOIDED |
-11 MPH |
|
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
| 12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
|
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
| 25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 37 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-33 MPH |
| Warning Issued-Brights |
3.3 sec |
2 sec |
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the Ascent. But it costs extra on the Grand Cherokee L.
To deliver safety and visibility under dusty conditions the Subaru Ascent’s backup monitor has a standard rear washer to keep the view clear. A camera washer system costs extra on the Jeep Grand Cherokee L.
Both the Ascent and the Grand Cherokee L have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, available around view monitors and driver alert monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Subaru Ascent is safer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee L:
|
|
Ascent |
Grand Cherokee L |
|
|
Driver |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| Neck Injury Risk |
21% |
21% |
| Neck Compression |
8 lbs. |
84 lbs. |
| Leg Forces (l/r) |
159/292 lbs. |
482/259 lbs. |
|
|
Passenger |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| Leg Forces (l/r) |
35/30 lbs. |
400/347 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH moderate front offset crash tests on new cars. In this updated test, results indicate that the Ascent is much safer than the Grand Cherokee L:
|
|
Ascent |
Grand Cherokee L |
| Overall Evaluation |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
| Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Chest Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Thigh/hip Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Leg/foot Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Restraints |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Rear Passenger Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck Rating |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
| Thigh Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Restraints |
ACCEPTABLE |
ACCEPTABLE |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Subaru Ascent is safer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee L:
|
|
Ascent |
Grand Cherokee L |
|
|
Front Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
37 |
89 |
| Chest Movement |
.5 inches |
.8 inches |
| Abdominal Force |
73 lbs. |
147 lbs. |
| Hip Force |
274 lbs. |
276 lbs. |
|
|
Rear Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
81 |
92 |
| Spine Acceleration |
27 G’s |
34 G’s |
| Hip Force |
346 lbs. |
375 lbs. |
|
|
Into Pole |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
149 |
376 |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Subaru Ascent is safer than the Grand Cherokee L:
|
|
Ascent |
Grand Cherokee L |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Head Injury Criterion |
82 |
163 |
| Neck Tension |
178 lbs. |
312 lbs. |
| Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Shoulder Deflection |
.83 in |
1.06 in |
| Torso Max Deflection |
.98 in |
1.3 in |
| Torso Deflection Rate |
6 MPH |
7 MPH |
| Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Shoulder Deflection |
1.26 in |
1.38 in |
| Torso Max Deflection |
1.18 in |
1.69 in |
| Torso Deflection Rate |
9 MPH |
11 MPH |
| Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Pelvis Force |
201 lbs. |
915 lbs. |
| Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the Ascent is 1.5% less likely to roll over than the Grand Cherokee L.
The Subaru Ascent achieved a “Top Safety Pick” rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) for the 2025 model year. This recognition was based on its impressive performance in the small overlap frontal crash test, updated moderate overlap front crash test, updated side impact crash test, headlight evaluations, and pedestrian crash prevention testing. The Grand Cherokee L is not a “Top Safety Pick” for 2025.

